From Indiana Wesleyan University:
By Jared Johnson (sr) and Navar Watson (jr)
Every other Wednesday, the editors of The Sojourn cram into a stuffy little room and make the paper happen. Several pieces of The Sojourn memorabilia decorate the walls of this room, including a giant $200 JK! check; two cross-stitch pictures of American Indians; a crucifix and a dry erase board full of amusing quotes from slap-happy staff members.
But also included in this room of memories is a heavy archive of Indiana Wesleyan University’s student newspapers, ranging as far back as 1941 with the Marion College Journal.
Every now and then (when procrastinating on work), we take a peek at old editions — mainly from the years we were born — and read the top stories of the day.
As we look at these past newspapers, brittle and yellowed with age, we think about the effort all the student journalists before us put forth in making the print product.
We never thought that we, after 74-plus years of a paper product, would be the staff that puts together the last print edition.
But this isn’t an ending. It’s the closing of a chapter, and the start of something new.
Beginning in the fall, The Sojourn’s coverage will move completely online. This is a trend many professional news outlets are turning to, as article traffic becomes more and more online-dominated.
We believe this change will allow us to get more articles out, and quicker, since writers will be aiming to finish their articles as soon as possible, rather than by the time the print edition is released.
This is all a part of the ONE (Online News Exchange) Newsroom initiative, in which The Sojourn will merge with GrantCOnnected.net, another online news outlet launched by Dr. Randall King’s Convergent Journalism class last fall.
GrantCOnnected.net will focus on stories in Grant County outside of the residential campus, while The Sojourn will remain dedicated to covering IWU’s campus.
With the two online publications operating in one combined newsroom, staff members will be able to write for either outlet. IWU’s radio and television stations, 94.3 The Fortress and WIWU-TV, will also collaborate with ONE staff.
We have enjoyed our time with the print edition, and we hope you stick with us as we venture into this new format.
Prev
Friday, April 17, 2015
Sunday, March 29, 2015
Why This New Wave of Independent Magazines is Thriving
Why This New Wave of Independent Magazines is Thriving
March 26, 2015, David Pilcher
“If you believe what you read,” writes Rana Niamh Smith in The Telegraph, “the print media has been on its deathbed ever since the birth of the internet.”
“But someone forgot to tell the creatives behind the latest wave of independent magazines,” Smith continues. “There seems to be a new launch looking for funding on Kickstarter every week, and the sector is booming: last year the independent-magazine subscription service Stack reported a 78 per cent increase in revenue, with its number of subscribers growing by 76 per cent.”
What’s behind this growth is a move away from mass market publications, and toward boutique-style magazines that dive deeply into a narrower niche.
This is an excerpt. To read the entire article click here.
Sunday, March 22, 2015
Why Journalists are Not Happy These Days
From: http://www.freeportpress.com/why-journalists-are-not-happy-these-days/
Why Journalists Are Not Happy These Days
March 19, 2015David Pilcher
The hallmark of good technology is that it makes our lives easier, more enjoyable and therefore makes us happier. So why are so many journalists saying that working in this digital tech-heavy age is harder than ever?
“According to the survey of North American journalists and media professionals released today, 68% of journalists feel that their job has become more difficult in the last 5 years,” notes this article from Talking New Media.
The article cites results from a survey conducted by ISEBOX.com that showed “an overwhelming number of journalists and media professionals are unhappy with how they are approached by corporate communications, resulting in working longer hours and increased frustration.”
“There seems to be a major gap between what reporters need, and how corporate communications are providing these needs,” says Salvatore Salpietro, CTO of ISEBOX.com in the TNM article.
“There is increasing pressure to gain earned media coverage by corporate communications and public relations teams, yet they are still making the process very difficult for media to access content and put together a story by using things like FTP, email, locked-down websites, and manual requests – all of these are enthusiasm-killers,” Salpietro continued.
With the growing focus on multi-media content, journalists are still finding that most pitches from corporate communications departments and PR agencies do not offer images, videos, graphics or even corporate logos, leaving the reporter to scramble to put it together.
“If a pitch doesn’t contain graphics I can include with my article, it’s hard for me to take it on. Even better if there is a video. I am under strict deadlines to produce at least 5-7 articles a day, and visual content is always required. Wasting hours sourcing and editing a company’s logo or media content to accompany a post is something I literally cannot afford,” says Karen Fratti, freelance writer for Mediabistro and Huffington Post.
“When a pitch comes with everything attached, no cumbersome downloads, I want to hug that PR rep. And, I’m more likely to pick up on the next release from them, too,” she says.
Next time you make a pitch, do the journalist and yourself a favor and tuck in the multi-media content they need with your email. Content, baby, content.
Tuesday, March 10, 2015
Digital Shift the Only Way to Save Some Newspapers
From eReader: http://goodereader.com/blog/digital-publishing/digital-shift-the-only-way-to-save-some-newspapers
Digital Shift the Only Way to Save Some Newspapers
March 9, 2015 By Mercy Pilkington 0 Comments
With all of the focus on making the transition to digital and how that is helping news outlets and periodicals alike, it’s easy to overlook the fact that it’s not just about increasing ad revenue or reaching subscribers where they read. For some outlets, it will mean the difference between closing their doors and keeping a centuries-old institution alive.
In an article for DelawareOnline, Scott Goss highlighted the struggles of the 133-year-old University of Delaware student weekly newspaper, a tradition at the university that has seen circulation drop from 10,000 subscribers to only 2,000, and advertising drop significantly.
“You come into this role and you see it as an editorial job,” said Elizabeth Quartararo, The Review‘s editor-in-chief, to Goss. “You don’t expect that it’s going to require a lot of business savvy or that you’re going to have to make real business decisions that could affect what the paper looks like five or 10 years from now.”
Before considering a switch to being a digital-only imprint, a move that still hasn’t been confirmed due to the long-standing history and sentimental value of the print edition, Review staffers even attempted a crowdfunding campaign to bring enough donations to keep the paper in operation in its current form.
If it serves as any consolation to the staff and to university administrators who will make the ultimate decision to continue funding the effort or not, this issue is in no way limited to this particular paper. Apart from the multiple news outlets who’ve already adopted digital in some large-scale way, universities around the country are also making the transition to digital, whether it’s for campus news, student magazines, alumni reports, or any other similar publication. According to Goss, “Many former dailies, such as Boston University’s Daily Free Press and the University of California Berkley’s Daily Californian, are now printing fewer days a week…The Columbia Daily Spectator, the student newspaper of Columbia University in New York, completed a successful transition to an all-digital product last spring, when it became the first Ivy League school to eliminate its print edition.”
Unfortunately, the switch to digital also carries with it a built-in flaw, which is that subscribers expect to read digital at a lower price–hence a lot of the argument between booksellers and publishers over ebook pricing–and advertisers expect to pay less for digital ad space. While the costs associated with producing a digital edition are minimally lower due to eliminating the print, production, and distribution costs, that expense is usually nominal compared with the salaries of the people who are writing and editing the content and producing the layout. That expense didn’t diminish just because the reading format has changed.
Digital Shift the Only Way to Save Some Newspapers
March 9, 2015 By Mercy Pilkington 0 Comments
With all of the focus on making the transition to digital and how that is helping news outlets and periodicals alike, it’s easy to overlook the fact that it’s not just about increasing ad revenue or reaching subscribers where they read. For some outlets, it will mean the difference between closing their doors and keeping a centuries-old institution alive.
In an article for DelawareOnline, Scott Goss highlighted the struggles of the 133-year-old University of Delaware student weekly newspaper, a tradition at the university that has seen circulation drop from 10,000 subscribers to only 2,000, and advertising drop significantly.
“You come into this role and you see it as an editorial job,” said Elizabeth Quartararo, The Review‘s editor-in-chief, to Goss. “You don’t expect that it’s going to require a lot of business savvy or that you’re going to have to make real business decisions that could affect what the paper looks like five or 10 years from now.”
Before considering a switch to being a digital-only imprint, a move that still hasn’t been confirmed due to the long-standing history and sentimental value of the print edition, Review staffers even attempted a crowdfunding campaign to bring enough donations to keep the paper in operation in its current form.
If it serves as any consolation to the staff and to university administrators who will make the ultimate decision to continue funding the effort or not, this issue is in no way limited to this particular paper. Apart from the multiple news outlets who’ve already adopted digital in some large-scale way, universities around the country are also making the transition to digital, whether it’s for campus news, student magazines, alumni reports, or any other similar publication. According to Goss, “Many former dailies, such as Boston University’s Daily Free Press and the University of California Berkley’s Daily Californian, are now printing fewer days a week…The Columbia Daily Spectator, the student newspaper of Columbia University in New York, completed a successful transition to an all-digital product last spring, when it became the first Ivy League school to eliminate its print edition.”
Unfortunately, the switch to digital also carries with it a built-in flaw, which is that subscribers expect to read digital at a lower price–hence a lot of the argument between booksellers and publishers over ebook pricing–and advertisers expect to pay less for digital ad space. While the costs associated with producing a digital edition are minimally lower due to eliminating the print, production, and distribution costs, that expense is usually nominal compared with the salaries of the people who are writing and editing the content and producing the layout. That expense didn’t diminish just because the reading format has changed.
Wednesday, February 25, 2015
LifeWay Research Surveys Christian Media's Reach
Christian media's reach surveyed by LifeWay Research
by Bob Smietana, posted Wednesday, February 25, 2015 (an hour ago)
NASHVILLE (BP) -- Christian broadcasters have a devoted following, with about two-thirds of weekly churchgoers and evangelicals saying they tune in to Christian radio and television on a regular basis.
Christian books have a reach among churchgoers and evangelicals, and Christian movies remain popular, with about four in 10 Americans having seen one in the last year.
But many Americans never connect to Christian media.
Those are among the findings of a new study on the use of Christian media from Nashville-based LifeWay Research. The study, sponsored by the National Religious Broadcasters, included an online survey of 2,252 Americans and a phone survey of 1,009 Americans.
"Christian media delivers teaching, music and entertainment to a predominantly Christian constituency," Ed Stetzer, executive director of LifeWay Research, noted. "Not surprisingly, those who embrace Christian teaching will value and consume these the most." Stetzer released the study's findings Feb. 25 during the NRB national convention in Nashville.
This is an excerpt. To read the entire article, click here.
by Bob Smietana, posted Wednesday, February 25, 2015 (an hour ago)
NASHVILLE (BP) -- Christian broadcasters have a devoted following, with about two-thirds of weekly churchgoers and evangelicals saying they tune in to Christian radio and television on a regular basis.
Christian books have a reach among churchgoers and evangelicals, and Christian movies remain popular, with about four in 10 Americans having seen one in the last year.
But many Americans never connect to Christian media.
Those are among the findings of a new study on the use of Christian media from Nashville-based LifeWay Research. The study, sponsored by the National Religious Broadcasters, included an online survey of 2,252 Americans and a phone survey of 1,009 Americans.
"Christian media delivers teaching, music and entertainment to a predominantly Christian constituency," Ed Stetzer, executive director of LifeWay Research, noted. "Not surprisingly, those who embrace Christian teaching will value and consume these the most." Stetzer released the study's findings Feb. 25 during the NRB national convention in Nashville.
This is an excerpt. To read the entire article, click here.
Thursday, February 12, 2015
Only 54 percent of Americans read a book in 2014
NEA: Only 54 percent of Americans read a book in 2014
Written by Shawn A. Akers
Thursday, 12 February 2015 09:00 AM EST
reading-a-bookThe statistics may be shocking to some. But according a study done by the National Endowment for the Arts and the Nielsen research firm, only 54 percent of Americans read a book of any kind last year, print or digital.
The “Decade of Arts Engagement” survey, which included 37,000 Americans, also revealed that the number of adults who read at least one novel, play or poem within the past year fell from 50% in 2008 to 47% percent in 2012. Thirty years ago, that number was at 56%.
Additionally, the survey revealed that the decline in fiction reading occurred mostly among white Americans—including men and women of various educational backgrounds—but the rates held steady among non-white and Hispanic groups.
Similar to newspapers, sales of print books are on a down slope. Fiction sales have suffered more than those of nonfiction. The sales of e-books have somewhat offset that trend, with 28% of adults reading in e-book in 2013, up 23% percent from the previous year, as reported on marketwatch.com.
Elizabeth Birr Moje, an education professor at the University of Michigan in Ann Arbor, believes the dip in fiction reading could simply be temporary.
“We have to be careful about making too much of changes from one point in time to another in examining [a] social phenomenon,” Moje told marketwatch.com.
Author Christopher Sorrentino told Dennis Abrams of publishingperspectives.com that biographies and self-help books could have a “certain utilitarian appeal.”
Market Watch’s Quentin Fottrell speculates that simple narcissism could also be a major contributor to the drop in the popularity of fiction.
“Americans may be more fascinated with their own lives than with those featured in great works of literary fiction,” he wrote. Fottrell pointed out that 56% of Internet users have Googled themselves.
According to a 2013 report by eMarketer, Americans spend 23 hours each week using social media, emailing and texting, to go along with easily accessible entertainment such as online gambling, music and movie and TV sites such as Hulu and Netflix.
At MarketWatch, Quintin Fottrell broke down the results of a new survey by the NEA along with research by the marketing firm Nielsen to determine what exactly Americans are reading and how it breaks down by gender.
Some of the results:
The number of adults who read at least one novel, play or poem within the past year fell from 50% in 2008 to 47% in 2012, according to a new survey of over 37,000 Americans, “A Decade of Arts Engagement” by the National Endowment for the Arts. (Thirty years ago, that number was at 56%.)
While reading fiction rose from 2002 to 2008, it’s been falling off ever since, and is now back down to 2002 levels. According to Fottrell, “The decline in fiction reading last year occurred mostly among white Americans, including men and women of various educational backgrounds; rates held steady among non-white and Hispanic groups,” according to the report.
Perhaps not surprisingly, men read more nonfiction than fiction; women read more fiction than men. Young adults are also more likely to read fiction than nonfiction, while Americans aged 75 and older are more likely to read nonfiction.
There were state by state differences as well. In Washington, 63% read literary fiction, dropping down to 56% in Colorado, Rhode Island and Connecticut, with just 37% in Nevada, 36% in Virginia, and … 34% in Alabama.
A mere 54% of Americans read any kind of book last year, be it print or digital, fiction or nonfiction. But fiction has seen the greatest drop in sales, according to Nielsen. While adult print book sales fell 2.5% to around 501.6 million from 2012 to 2013, non fiction sales were stable at 225.2 million; fiction sales dropped 11% to just 103.5 million. Poetry saw the sharpest decline in readership of any “literary genre,” falling from 12% to just 6.7%, according to the NEA.
But why the drop in fiction sales? Author Christopher Sorrentino speculated that biographies and self-help books could have a “certain utilitarian appeal. “Who wants to spend two weeks reading a novel that you might not like much?” he asked Fottrell.
And in an era of social media, it’s more and more difficult to “bond around the water cooler” to talk about a novel. Sorrentino pointed out that while there are thousands of novels published every year, only “a few hundred” get noticed, even by a “discerning reading public” either through newspaper reviews or celebrity endorsements. And while there are those occasional books that do go water cooler cool such as Gone Girl or Fifty Shades of Grey, “It’s really hard to read William Faulkner and go into the office and say, ‘What did you think of that last chapter of Light in August?’ In addition, he pointed out; people who might normally be attracted to novels can get fictional narratives complete with “complex characters” on cable TV.
Another possible explanation for the drop in popularity of fiction, Fottrell speculates is simple narcissism: “Americans,” he writes, “may be more fascinated with their own lives than with those featured in great works of literary fiction.” 56% of Internet users, he points out, have Googled themselves.
Then add to that self-interest the wide array of easily accessible entertainment, such as online gambling, music, and movie and TV sites such as Hulu and Netflix (according to a 2013 report by eMarketer, Americans spend 23 per hours each and every week ‘using social media, emailing and texting”), it’s a wonder that anybody has time to read anything at all.
To read the entire article, click here.
Written by Shawn A. Akers
Thursday, 12 February 2015 09:00 AM EST
reading-a-bookThe statistics may be shocking to some. But according a study done by the National Endowment for the Arts and the Nielsen research firm, only 54 percent of Americans read a book of any kind last year, print or digital.
The “Decade of Arts Engagement” survey, which included 37,000 Americans, also revealed that the number of adults who read at least one novel, play or poem within the past year fell from 50% in 2008 to 47% percent in 2012. Thirty years ago, that number was at 56%.
Additionally, the survey revealed that the decline in fiction reading occurred mostly among white Americans—including men and women of various educational backgrounds—but the rates held steady among non-white and Hispanic groups.
Similar to newspapers, sales of print books are on a down slope. Fiction sales have suffered more than those of nonfiction. The sales of e-books have somewhat offset that trend, with 28% of adults reading in e-book in 2013, up 23% percent from the previous year, as reported on marketwatch.com.
Elizabeth Birr Moje, an education professor at the University of Michigan in Ann Arbor, believes the dip in fiction reading could simply be temporary.
“We have to be careful about making too much of changes from one point in time to another in examining [a] social phenomenon,” Moje told marketwatch.com.
Author Christopher Sorrentino told Dennis Abrams of publishingperspectives.com that biographies and self-help books could have a “certain utilitarian appeal.”
Market Watch’s Quentin Fottrell speculates that simple narcissism could also be a major contributor to the drop in the popularity of fiction.
“Americans may be more fascinated with their own lives than with those featured in great works of literary fiction,” he wrote. Fottrell pointed out that 56% of Internet users have Googled themselves.
According to a 2013 report by eMarketer, Americans spend 23 hours each week using social media, emailing and texting, to go along with easily accessible entertainment such as online gambling, music and movie and TV sites such as Hulu and Netflix.
At MarketWatch, Quintin Fottrell broke down the results of a new survey by the NEA along with research by the marketing firm Nielsen to determine what exactly Americans are reading and how it breaks down by gender.
Some of the results:
The number of adults who read at least one novel, play or poem within the past year fell from 50% in 2008 to 47% in 2012, according to a new survey of over 37,000 Americans, “A Decade of Arts Engagement” by the National Endowment for the Arts. (Thirty years ago, that number was at 56%.)
While reading fiction rose from 2002 to 2008, it’s been falling off ever since, and is now back down to 2002 levels. According to Fottrell, “The decline in fiction reading last year occurred mostly among white Americans, including men and women of various educational backgrounds; rates held steady among non-white and Hispanic groups,” according to the report.
Perhaps not surprisingly, men read more nonfiction than fiction; women read more fiction than men. Young adults are also more likely to read fiction than nonfiction, while Americans aged 75 and older are more likely to read nonfiction.
There were state by state differences as well. In Washington, 63% read literary fiction, dropping down to 56% in Colorado, Rhode Island and Connecticut, with just 37% in Nevada, 36% in Virginia, and … 34% in Alabama.
A mere 54% of Americans read any kind of book last year, be it print or digital, fiction or nonfiction. But fiction has seen the greatest drop in sales, according to Nielsen. While adult print book sales fell 2.5% to around 501.6 million from 2012 to 2013, non fiction sales were stable at 225.2 million; fiction sales dropped 11% to just 103.5 million. Poetry saw the sharpest decline in readership of any “literary genre,” falling from 12% to just 6.7%, according to the NEA.
But why the drop in fiction sales? Author Christopher Sorrentino speculated that biographies and self-help books could have a “certain utilitarian appeal. “Who wants to spend two weeks reading a novel that you might not like much?” he asked Fottrell.
And in an era of social media, it’s more and more difficult to “bond around the water cooler” to talk about a novel. Sorrentino pointed out that while there are thousands of novels published every year, only “a few hundred” get noticed, even by a “discerning reading public” either through newspaper reviews or celebrity endorsements. And while there are those occasional books that do go water cooler cool such as Gone Girl or Fifty Shades of Grey, “It’s really hard to read William Faulkner and go into the office and say, ‘What did you think of that last chapter of Light in August?’ In addition, he pointed out; people who might normally be attracted to novels can get fictional narratives complete with “complex characters” on cable TV.
Another possible explanation for the drop in popularity of fiction, Fottrell speculates is simple narcissism: “Americans,” he writes, “may be more fascinated with their own lives than with those featured in great works of literary fiction.” 56% of Internet users, he points out, have Googled themselves.
Then add to that self-interest the wide array of easily accessible entertainment, such as online gambling, music, and movie and TV sites such as Hulu and Netflix (according to a 2013 report by eMarketer, Americans spend 23 per hours each and every week ‘using social media, emailing and texting”), it’s a wonder that anybody has time to read anything at all.
To read the entire article, click here.
Friday, January 23, 2015
Sports Illustrated Lays Off All Photographers
By Donald R. Winslow
© 2015 News Photographer magazine
NEW YORK, NY (January 23, 2015) – The remaining six staff photographers at Sports Illustrated magazine were all laid off yesterday.
Staff photographers Robert Beck, Simon Bruty, Bill Frakes, David E. Klutho, John W. McDonough, and Al Tielemans were informed of the decision around noon Eastern time on Thursday.
Sports Illustrated director of photography Brad Smith confirmed the move this morning to News Photographer magazine.
"It's true," Smith said. "There was a decision made through the company to restructure various departments, including at Sports Illustrated. Unfortunately economic circumstances are such that it has cut the six staff photographers."
Smith said the plan going forward is "to re-evaluate what's best for the magazine, not just financially but also content-wise. Our commitment to photography is as strong as ever, and we will continue to create the best original content possible."
As early as last summer there were rumors of pending staff cuts at Sports Illustrated as well as at other Time-Life publications because of the company's plan to move this year into new quarters downtown. The new floorspace is considerably smaller, and it will seat far fewer people. The magazines are moving because they can no longer afford the rent where they are, one of the magazine's contributing photographers was told by an SI editor.
Smith said the six staff photographers "have contributed to the success of the magazine and the Sports Illustrated franchise, and I hope that they may continue to do so under slightly different circumstances." He said that while the six are no longer staff photographers, that does not preclude them for continuing to shoot for the magazine if they so desire.
"In my grandest thoughts I hope they will continue to contribute to the magazine," Smith said. "I can't imagine a world where they don't. We just have to figure out what this new structure is."
Smith said Sports Illustrated isn't planning on changing what they do, just the process.
"Our commitment to photography hasn't changed," he said. "We're still going to cover games, we're going to shoot portraits, we're going to cover Olympics, we'll be at the Final Four, we will be at championships, we'll be there."
The bad news for Sports Illustrated photographers comes less than 12 hours after many sports shooters were in Manhattan for the premier of the ESPN film "Keepers Of The Streak," a new documentary about four photogrpahers who have shot every Super Bowl since its beginning.
© 2015 News Photographer magazine
NEW YORK, NY (January 23, 2015) – The remaining six staff photographers at Sports Illustrated magazine were all laid off yesterday.
Staff photographers Robert Beck, Simon Bruty, Bill Frakes, David E. Klutho, John W. McDonough, and Al Tielemans were informed of the decision around noon Eastern time on Thursday.
Sports Illustrated director of photography Brad Smith confirmed the move this morning to News Photographer magazine.
"It's true," Smith said. "There was a decision made through the company to restructure various departments, including at Sports Illustrated. Unfortunately economic circumstances are such that it has cut the six staff photographers."
Smith said the plan going forward is "to re-evaluate what's best for the magazine, not just financially but also content-wise. Our commitment to photography is as strong as ever, and we will continue to create the best original content possible."
As early as last summer there were rumors of pending staff cuts at Sports Illustrated as well as at other Time-Life publications because of the company's plan to move this year into new quarters downtown. The new floorspace is considerably smaller, and it will seat far fewer people. The magazines are moving because they can no longer afford the rent where they are, one of the magazine's contributing photographers was told by an SI editor.
Smith said the six staff photographers "have contributed to the success of the magazine and the Sports Illustrated franchise, and I hope that they may continue to do so under slightly different circumstances." He said that while the six are no longer staff photographers, that does not preclude them for continuing to shoot for the magazine if they so desire.
"In my grandest thoughts I hope they will continue to contribute to the magazine," Smith said. "I can't imagine a world where they don't. We just have to figure out what this new structure is."
Smith said Sports Illustrated isn't planning on changing what they do, just the process.
"Our commitment to photography hasn't changed," he said. "We're still going to cover games, we're going to shoot portraits, we're going to cover Olympics, we'll be at the Final Four, we will be at championships, we'll be there."
The bad news for Sports Illustrated photographers comes less than 12 hours after many sports shooters were in Manhattan for the premier of the ESPN film "Keepers Of The Streak," a new documentary about four photogrpahers who have shot every Super Bowl since its beginning.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
